Arguments

Were We Betrayed?

The conditions that forced Northwest Connect into existence–-thousands not connected to now vital broadband services, no competition in broadband services, no timely upgrades in our region–-grew from the 1996 Telecommunications Act. That Act exchanged universal service as a mandate for monopoly telecom services for competition in the telecom marketplace. For our region it has not worked out well. For us the Act has made universal service and real competition only possible through municipal ownership of new broadband networks. Yet our incumbent carriers battle against such networks at every turn. Yes, we were betrayed.

Screen Shot 2018-10-03 at 1.42.33 PM

Broadband Rates Will Only Increase

Broadband 20 years ago meant 200 kbps; today it means 25 mbps; in ten years it may be touching a gigabit per second. Upward pressure will come from 4K and 8K television, the latter needing 90 mbps, plus the Internet of Things clogging local WiFi networks with constant messages, plus Augmented and Virtual Reality, plus uploading massive files that now take days. In ten years cable television networks will be as out of date as DSL networks are today. Increasing speed will drive Fiber to the Home networks…

1200px-Colosseum_in_Rome,_Italy_-_April_2007

Is Antenna Radiation Harmful?

While we have serious doubts about 5G blanketing our area anytime soon—measured in decades—we hope to use our new fiber optic networks for mobile enhancement, connecting many small cell antennas to cover current dead zones.  Some members of our community have raised the specter of harm from antenna radiation.  These concerns are misguided.  The science on low frequency radiation to date shows no consistent results—many studies suggest some danger, many more of the more than 25,000 studies in total suggest none under normal circumstances.  But even if you are alarmed but still want to use your smart phone, you should want small cell antennas everywhere.  The maximum signal your smart phone can receive is thousands of times lower than the signals it transmits, so great is the loss of signal power from an antenna.  To save battery life smart phones transmit the least amount of power with the greatest received power.  The closer you are to an antenna the lower will be the radiation you absorb.  We should be urging for small cell antennas everywhere.

King_Henry_V_from_NPG

A Legal Victory for Connecticut

Starting in the summer of 2017 Frontier and our cable television companies persuaded our Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA) to rule that state Statute §16-233, called the Muni-gain statute, limited municipalities in Connecticut to networks they owned to municipal purposes, prohibiting such networks for broadband services to residences and businesses.  Several town-based organizations in Connecticut, with several individual cities, sued PURA.  The first decision from Judge Shortall of the Connecticut appellate court ruled against every PURA argument.  PURA and its allies decided against further appeals.  Statute §16-233 is now affirmed and municipalities in Connecticut are free to pursue broadband networks for their constituents.

download (2)

Is 5G the answer?

Depends on the question. But as a substitute for fiber optics to the home, or a short term driver for amazing new applications, or a solution to rural communities suffering from inadequate broadband services, the answer is no.  Behind all the hype is a host of serious problems and the unnerving fact that none of the new applications critical to the success of 5G exist yet. We are looking at decades, not years, for universal 5G. Those who listen to the hype as a reason to delay municipal fiber optic networks to homes and businesses trap themselves in carrier mythology. Some day 5G will be part of the landscape.  Just don’t set your clocks by today’s promises.

BN-ST221_cmotvs_P_20170331155229

Is Cable Television the Answer?

If your home is passed by a cable television network and the cable television company is willing to connect your home without some extraordinary charge, then cable television will provide adequate broadband service to many homes for quite some time. The reason is less that the cable network itself is growing in base capacity, although cable companies do what they can to upgrade and improve capacity short of an overhaul.  What saves the cable network is that we actually use the network at much lower rates than would be expected given the aggregate capacity available.  However, cable networks have limited flexibility relative to upstream capacity that is becoming more important for a certain class of users and applications, its network will not support the future without massive upgrades, cable television companies will not connect everyone, and their service is terrible.  Oh, and we would surely profit from having real competition in our region, best if it had good service as well as universal connectivity.

cables-close-up-connection-159304

Why is Telephone and Cable Service So Bad?

Telephone and cable television companies live at the bottom of the barrel in the service department.  They are universally and justifiably reviled. Many customers would bolt from all of them if a company had comparable products but real human beings living nearby who responded to the first call and knew what he or she was talking about.  Why has no major player in the business done this, service like it used to be when carriers were highly regulated, or service we still get for home security systems? The answer lies in their history. Simply put, they cannot. They are trapped in an ancient system that treated service as a cost rather than a product, and they are too large, too controlled by their markets, to change.  They are stuck.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!